Welcome to the WRD Policy Tracker!

The WRD Policy Tracker follows the progress of gender-responsive and inclusive legal, policy, and planning frameworks in 193 UN Member States. It helps analyse comparative progress across regions and countries, and highlights good practice.

You can read more about the WRD Policy tracker including its purpose, scope, and use; or take a look at a summary of current findings

We update the WRD Policy Tracker every six months.  However, if you are aware of any new gender-responsive frameworks or any gaps in the Tracker, please feel free to share. Can't find your country?  Share a new framework.

Explore which UN Member States or regions have developed gender-responsive and inclusive disaster, climate or development frameworks (i.e. laws, policies, strategies, plans). 

Click on a region in the list below to find out more!
 

Explore the global distribution of gender-responsive and inclusive DRR/DRM frameworks through the following.

 

Global analysis shows that:


- 53 countries have developed gender-responsive DRR/DRM  frameworks.
- Almost half of the reviewed inclusive DRR/DRM frameworks are plans rather than laws or policies.
- Almost all the reviewed inclusive DRR/DRM frameworks have been developed for the national level.

Number of inclusive DRR/DRM frameworks by group
Type of inclusive DRR/DRM frameworks
Focus of inclusive frameworks
Level of inclusive DRR/DRM frameworks

Inter-regional analysis shows that:

- 70% of countries in the Pacific and 69% in the Americas and Caribbean have DRR/DRM frameworks inclusive of at least one high-risk group.

- 56% of countries in Asia, 54% in Eastern and Southern Africa, 43% in Western and Central Africa, and only 12% of countries in Europe and Central Asia have frameworks inclusive of at least one group.

- The few community-level and subnational-level inclusive frameworks publicly available and reviewed for the Policy Tracker, were all developed in Asia or the Pacific.

Number of inclusive DRR/DRM frameworks by region and group
Type of inclusive DRR/DRM frameworks by region
Type of gender-responsive frameworks by region
Focus of inclusive frameworks by region
Level of inclusive frameworks by region
% of countries in each region with DRR/DRM frameworks inclusive of AT LEAST ONE high-risk group

The Policy Tracker evaluates the level or degree of the following:  i) consultation during the development process; ii) meaningful participation in the development process; iii) inclusion of principles, commitments, and objectives for gender equality, women's leadership and inclusion; iv) responsiveness to the specific needs and priorities of high-risk groups; and v) commitment to addressing the underlying causes of unequal risk.

Analysis shows that:

- Only 8 countries indicate the meaningful participation of women or women's organisations, although more countries report consulting with women in the development of their DRR/DRM frameworks.

- 16 countries report the meaningful participation of children and youth representative organisations and representative authorities in the development of their frameworks, compared with 9 countries for persons with disabilities, and only 2 for indigenous people and ethnic minorities.

- Although 66 countries have frameworks including commitments for other high-risk groups (people living in extreme poverty, displaced people/migrants, or older people), only 11 of these reported consultation with at least one of these groups, and none of these (based on the desk-based review) report the meaningful participation of these groups.

Degree of inclusion of high-risk groups in DRM/DRR frameworks
Proportion of UN member states including high-risk group in their DRR/DRM frameworks

Find out the extent to which countries in each region are integrating high-risk groups in their DRR/DRM frameworks (laws, policies, strategies, and plans).

The analysis shows that:

  • countries in Asia, Pacific, the Americas and the Caribbean more consistently include children and youth, women, and persons with disabilities within their frameworks.
Number of inclusive DRM/DRR frameworks by high-risk group in the Pacific

The analysis shows that:

  • countries in Asia, Pacific, the Americas and the Caribbean more consistently include children and youth, women, and persons with disabilities within their frameworks.
Number of inclusive DRM/DRR frameworks by high-risk group in Asia

The analysis shows that:

  • countries in Asia, Pacific, the Americas and the Caribbean more consistently include children and youth, women, and persons with disabilities within their frameworks.
Number of inclusive DRM/DRR frameworks by high-risk group in Europe and Central Asia

The analysis shows that:

  • countries in Asia, Pacific, the Americas and the Caribbean more consistently include children and youth, women, and persons with disabilities within their frameworks.
Number of inclusive DRM/DRR frameworks by high-risk group in Northern Africa and the Middle East

The analysis shows that:

  • countries in Asia, Pacific, the Americas and the Caribbean more consistently include children and youth, women, and persons with disabilities within their frameworks.
Number of inclusive DRM/DRR frameworks by high-risk group in Western and Central Africa

The analysis shows that:

  • countries in Eastern and Southern Africa are more inclusive of displaced and migrant people, and indigenous and ethnic minorities compared with other regions. 
Number of inclusive DRM/DRR frameworks by high-risk group in Eastern and Southern Africa

The analysis shows that:

  • countries in Asia, Pacific, the Americas and the Caribbean more consistently include children and youth, women, and persons with disabilities within their frameworks.
Number of inclusive DRM/DRR frameworks by high-risk group in the Americas and Caribbean

Find out which Sendai Framework high-risk groups are included in the DRR/DRM frameworks in each region. 

Number of frameworks inclusive of women by region
Number of frameworks inclusive of women by region

Analysis shows that: 

- Women and their needs are most commonly included in DRR/DRM frameworks in the Pacific (50% of countries have developed gender-responsive frameworks), followed by the Americas and the Caribbean (43%), Asia (39%), and Western and Central Africa (35%).

Number of frameworks inclusive of children and youth by region
Number of frameworks inclusive of children and youth by region

Analysis shows that: 

- Children and youth are most commonly included in DRR/DRM frameworks in the Pacific (60% of countries have developed frameworks inclusive of this group), followed by Eastern and Southern Africa (54%), the Americas and the Caribbean (51%), and Asia (50%).

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) defines a child as everyone under 18 unless, "under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier."

Number of frameworks inclusive of people with disabilities by region
Number of frameworks inclusive of people with disabilities by region

Analysis shows that: 

- Persons with disabilities are most commonly included in DRR/DRM frameworks in the Americas and the Caribbean (51% of countries have developed frameworks inclusive of this group), followed by the Pacific (50%), and Asia (44%).

According to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006), persons with disabilities include those who have long-term physical, mental, intellectual, or sensory impairments which in interaction with various barriers may hinder their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others.

Number of frameworks inclusive of people living in extreme poverty by region
Number of frameworks inclusive of people living in extreme poverty by region

Find out which countries have developed frameworks inclusive of all Sendai Framework high-risk groups and explore which countries have developed “good practice” gender-responsive frameworks.

The findings suggest that:

  • Papua New Guinea, Vanuatu, Bangladesh, Nepal, Jordan, Argentina, and El Salvador are good examples of countries with DRR/DRM frameworks that are inclusive of all Sendai Framework high-risk groups; and
  • Fiji, India, Guatemala, Togo, and Chile are good examples of countries with DRR/DRM frameworks that are gender-responsive.
  Legislation Policy Strategy Plan
Papua New Guinea    
Vanuatu  
   
Bangladesh    
 
Nepal      
 
Jordan    
 
Argentina      
 
El Salvador      
Bostwana    
 
Liberia  
   
Uganda  
   
Zambia  
   
Number of frameworks inclusive of displaced or migrant people by region
Number of frameworks inclusive of displaced or migrant people by region

Analysis shows that: 

- Displaced and migrant people are most commonly included in DRR/DRM frameworks in Southern and Eastern Africa (29% of countries have developed frameworks inclusive of this group), then Asia (22%), and the Pacific (20%).

While there is no formal legal definition of an international migrant, most experts agree that an international migrant is someone who changes their country of residence, irrespective of the reason for migration or legal status. Displacement refers to the unplanned movement of people, most usually internally within countries, for example following a disaster or conflict.

Number of frameworks inclusive of indigenous and ethnic minorities by region
Number of frameworks inclusive of indigenous and ethnic minorities by region

Analysis shows that: 

- Indigenous and ethnic minorities are most commonly included in DRR/DRM frameworks in Southern and Eastern Africa (33% of countries have developed frameworks inclusive of this group), then the Americas and the Caribbean (29%), and then Asia (28%).

Given the diversity of indigenous peoples, an official definition of “indigenous” has not been adopted by any UN-system body. This term is understood to include people:

  • that self-identify as indigenous people;
  • with strong link to territories and surrounding natural resources;
  • with distinct social, economic or political systems;
  • with distinct language, culture and beliefs; and
  • that form non-dominant groups of society.
Number of frameworks inclusive of older people by region
Number of frameworks inclusive of older people by region

Analysis shows that: 

- Older persons are most commonly included in DRR/DRM frameworks in the Americas and the Caribbean (49% of countries have developed frameworks inclusive of this group), then Asia (44%), Southern and Eastern Africa (42%) and the Pacific (40%).

An older person is generally defined as a person who is over 60 years of age, although often communities use other socio-cultural referents to define age, including family status, physical appearance, or age-related health conditions.

 

The findings suggest that Papua New Guinea, Vanuatu, Bangladesh, Nepal, Jordan, Argentina, and El Salvador are good examples of countries with DRR/DRM frameworks that are inclusive of all Sendai Framework high-risk groups.

 

   Laws Policy Strategy Plan
Papua New Guinea    
Vanuatu  
   
Bangladesh    
 
Nepal      
 
Jordan    
 
Argentina      
 
El Salvador      
Bostwana    
 
Liberia  
   
Uganda  
   
Zambia  
   

The findings suggest that good practice examples for the inclusion of each Sendai Framework high-risk groups are:

  • Women - India, Fiji, Chile, Guatemala, Kenya, and Togo; 
  • Children - Philippines;
  • People with disabilities  - Federated States of Micronesia;
  • People living poverty - Cape Verde;
  • Displaced or migrant people - Bangladesh;
  • Indigenous or ethnic minorities - Canada; and
  • Older people  - Brazil.

 

  Laws Policy Strategy Plan
Women  
Children & youth
 
 
People living with disabilities      
People living in extreme poverty    
   
Displaced and migrant people    
 
Indigenous peoples/ ethnic minorities    
 
Older people    
 

The findings suggest that:

  • Fiji, India, Guatemala, Togo, Kenya, and Chile are good practice examples of DRR/DRM frameworks that are gender-responsive.

 

Country Laws Policy Strategy Plan
Fiji  
   
India      
Guatemala      
Togo      
Chile    
 
Kenya  
   
Kenya
   

The review found that no laws, policies, strategies, or plans exist that are inclusive of LGBTIQ+ individuals. 

Several non-governmental organisations and/or researcher organisations have shared guidelines on the inclusion of people with diverse sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics (SOGIESC) in disaster and climate risk reduction, humanitarian response, and resilience.  Two such examples are shared below. 

Down by the river
IGBQTA
There is however, reference to LGBTIQ+ individuals in the following:
 
  • A government memorandum in Poland;
  • A report summarising the seventh annual national roundtable on disaster risk reduction in Canada; and in
  • A development/humanitarian policy framework for Sweden, which identifies LGBTIQ+ people as a high-risk group.
IGBQTAIGBQTAIGBQTA